The foreword 0.
This article exposes hunan Xiangxue Information Technology Co., LTD., after it was discovered that it stole other people’s articles as its knowledge reserve, it first refused the apology letter, then admitted the apology letter and made it public for a month to request the deletion of the original text, and finally deleted the apology letter in less than a week. These two shameless behaviors. Those of you who have read this can skip to section 5 and see this brazen operation.
The original intention that writes this article, because own article was stolen used. To what extent? See below:
The only difference is that the three versions of AndroidStudio shown here are hyperlinks. I’ll just copy it in plain text.
What’s particularly striking is that only 1,105 original reads were read, while 2,375 were stolen.
1. The status quo
Many programmers prefer Google to Baidu when looking for solutions to problems. Why ? !!!!!!!!!! This part has a lot to do with who we are. The shortest blog I’ve ever seen, with just a title and an address that goes to the original blog page. Have seen the most conscientious blog, tell others, this is reprinted, and attach the original link. The most heartless blogger I’ve ever seen is probably the one or company I met today. Therefore, when Baidu searches, the results are almost the same, but when Google searches, there is almost no such situation. See the comparison below:
In the first 5 results of Baidu, the ones marked in red are the stable articles I posted on CSDN and Nuggets respectively. The blue mark was copied, and both records were made by the same person or company (as will be proved later). Plagiarism is at the top of the list.
In the first 5 results from Google, the blue ones are the ones I posted on nuggets, and the red ones are plagiarized articles. The following three articles are similar to search keywords in content. The other two duplicate articles were automatically ignored, probably because they didn’t get enough hits. And the original article came first.
Therefore, Baidu, if the motherland does not protect you, why do you dominate the domestic search market, and how much advertising fees do you benefit from it? (It is not said here that the first record is the advertising fee, Baidu advertising fee is known to all.) The main reason why I decided to write my blog at the beginning is that I was hit by such a blow. Therefore, I decided that there would be no reprinted or plagiarized articles in my blog home page, but only original and translated articles. So far I have done it. Please see flueky’s CSDN homepage.
2. Find out
In the blog I wrote in the past 4 years, I admit that there are not many articles that CAN be taken, and it is rare for an article to gain such favor, I am also very gratified. But I hate it when you do it. Others reprint it in order to share technology, which can make excellent articles easier to be Baidu, while respecting the original work. Is it appropriate to use articles that do not belong to you as a repository of your own knowledge?
The article in Jane’s book has been deleted. According to the previous screenshot, at the end of the article, you also shared a QQ group address.
Called the Android Technology Exchange Group, it has nearly 2,000 people. There are two types of people in a group: people who work for you or your company, and people who search for a group number. I don’t think it’s any of your business when it comes to technical communication, is it? Those naive and cute newbies share their problems in a group. If they are lucky, other gods will be willing to answer them. If they are unlucky, I’m afraid the group is useless. How many true programmers are busy these days? Overtime to sudden death cases are common, they will be free to do technical q&A? Those cute new I’m afraid is the sheep in your eyes, from time to time put a little preferential activities, promotion links, there are always a few sheep in your way. The following is to add a group, the administrator sent your private message.
Android advanced information, free access to yo!! But first you have to sign up for an online course, free of charge!!
This is the home page of registration, 5768 students are studying recently, and the total number of registration is 10,000. If you click on the free registration and register an account, the number will be +1. Maybe the mobile phone number you use when registering an account has also been obtained by them. Look at the course content, Java/Kotlin advanced, Android performance tuning, NDK, framework construction, wechat small program, Hybrid development, mobile architect, wow, the content is very comprehensive, you only need 20 courses can fully learn yo. Then you can get promoted and raise your salary, become the general manager, take the post of CEO, marry Bai Fumei, step on the peak of life, think about whether there is a little excitement!
Look at the introduction of the lecturer, 8 years of Android development project experience, former Ali P7 mobile architect. Poor me, I graduated just over five years ago. You have so many excellent, NB, god level people still need to copy my mediocre article?
3. Who is it
Through the administrator’s QQ information that you belong to Hunan Xiangxue Information Technology Co., LTD. Learning never ends. Copying never ends. Finally, based on the data provided by encyclopedia
If you are a man, I let this matter rest in your ignorance. But seeing that you are a business, and that everything you do is for profit, it is not appropriate to stop. Hence the following conversation.
After the initial QQ number was added, I was kicked out of the group, so I could not continue to chat privately. So I switched to a smaller one. The initial idea was that a private and public apology would be fine, but the other person would just ignore it and think it would be over. Thinking of contacting a lawyer friend to draft a lawyer’s letter, found there was no copyright notice in the blog, can only give up. Repeatedly stressed how to do if they can still receive their stolen articles on the Internet, the result flatly said no. I don’t know how to get rid of the body. Otherwise, you regard these two records of Baidu as bugs of Baidu?
I don’t know who is running this algorithm, but it is still easy to find QQ group numbers according to the hyperlink at the bottom of the article.
Finally, when I applied to join the group, I found that the group owner was the same person.
4. The conclusion
As the saying goes, have to forgive and forgive, why should I make such a fuss. I was going to call it a day, get in the crowd, yell a few words, let off steam and leave. Instead of apologizing, I got kicked out. With further investigation and research, it was found that this was to obtain user resources in an improper way, so as to promote the course and make profits. With the street, scan code to receive gifts, as well as the public number added wechat free to receive information for the same purpose. But by stealing the fruits of other people’s work in an unfair way, the matter will not go away.
Finally, I am not sure if the qualifications of the lecturers listed in your course are true. However, we should remind you that there is a crime in advertising called false publicity, which refers to that in commercial activities, operators use advertising or other methods to make false information inconsistent with the actual content of goods or services, resulting in misunderstanding of customers or consumers. Violating the principle of good faith, violating the accepted business principles, is a serious act of unfair competition (from encyclopedia, sweet! .
The original address is juejin.cn/post/684490… , interested partners can refer to.
5. The latter
The day after the article was posted, they came to me. Have the following dialogue:
He’s a victim himself, and he asked me to contribute. Threatened to delete all the articles except for a letter of apology.
We deal, he sends an apology, I delete the article.
The trick in the apology letter was to change the user name of Jane Book, and even change the avatar. Probably because the old name and picture would be easy to recognize.
Finally relented and gave in, deleting the article before the apology had been up for a month or 2,000 views. Instead, delete the article after it reaches 2000 views.
To my surprise, a week later, I went back to the page and found that it had been deleted. The apology received less than 100 views in the first three days.
So choose to expose this disgusting thing again. People without letter and not stand, I wish your company immortal, infamy.
Please do not shamelessly contact me to delete the article, this time will never softhearted, more will not softhearted.