In fact, it hasn’t been a few days since I broke the story, and it’s been four days since I first spoke out. But I’ve been getting a lot of news lately, from all kinds of sources, asking me for the latest.

Including the arc of the big guy also asked this thing:

In fact, the time was too short, and there was no progress for the time being. At present, the lecturer of the course apologized to me under pressure from public opinion. The courses suspected of infringement are still sold on MOOCs website, and they are still vigorously promoted due to the 6.18 big promotion.

So, it’s kind of like, emm…

Thank you all for your support. It’s really heartwarming

First of all, thank you for your support.

Rights protection, in fact, it is very difficult, especially intellectual property rights related events, it is even more difficult. I was troubled for a long time at the beginning, and at one point I thought about giving up. I didn’t even talk about it with my family. Later, I talked with some friends about this matter, and we all thought that we should try to protect our legitimate rights and interests legally and reasonably on the premise of protecting ourselves, and do not hurt others or yourself. After all, it is a very big platform, and everyone is a little worried about me. I would like to express my sincere thanks to these friends for their encouragement and support.

In addition, since MY first voice, also received a lot of friends in the article under the message, people for this kind of thing are a little angry, but also support me to continue to protect the rights, very very warm heart.

The first was published on June 6, 2021, and the second on June 7, 2021, both received considerable attention. The following figure is the data of wechat public account platform and Gold mining platform respectively:

Thank you for your attention and support for this incident. I have replied to all those who have time to reply, and I have explained to some friends who have asked me questions. I have also received many friends’ relationships.

But too many messages, some really can not reply in time. Besides, the company has been so busy lately, I have been working overtime, and this article was written at two in the morning.

There are also some misunderstandings, which I will also explain here. In fact, these articles are sent out, which is very common, to explain the course of the matter. Most of my friends can see that I want to protect my rights and protect my own legal rights and interests. Some people see that I want to promote selling classes, I also very confused, the article I did not write open source warehouse address, two did not put the course address, even the course name did not write, where is to promote ah, I am also some speechless. Some people questioned the use of the article, want to Sue to Sue, do not pretend to be poor here. To clarify, there is no pity, is a common programmer was infringed and then normal voice. Some people say, why don’t you open source and let others use it? When biaozi still want to erect memorial arch? Er… Open source projects don’t mean you can use them any way you want, guys. It’s not like I made a mistake or broke the law. It’s shocking. Therefore to this part of the message, the follow-up will not do the reply.

Apologies have been received from the course instructor

On June 7, 2021, an apology was received from the suspected instructor of the course. Why suspect? Because that wechat account looks like a trumpet, hahaha. Besides, I didn’t see him apologize on the public platform. After that, I said it wasn’t him again and again. I have nothing to say. So, let’s call it a suspect.

First of all, it was the lecturer who left me a message on his official account, asking to add me as a friend and then communicate with me about the specific situation:

I wasn’t at the computer, and I wasn’t paying attention. Later, someone in the QQ group looked for me and told me about this, and then added my friends. I am also a little confused, why everyone seems to know each other, but I do not know the lecturer, haha.

Because, I also promised in the communication with him, part of the chat will not be published. It involves personal privacy, and is some words of apology, also quite awkward, so just cut part of the content.

Here are some of the things he said:

Then, again, the apology:

Yeah, well, most of it was an apology.

Then, the process also mentioned his family ah, he saw the article these two days have nightmares and so on. I am a softhearted person, see these content, I really really don’t want to communicate, I also don’t want to post the article. I just want an answer. There’s no need to force it.

In the back, it is a simple chat. Then I promised him to stop writing for a while and told him to sleep well.

Promised somebody else, I also did not continue to send an article, had written a few articles intact. After I received the apology, I fulfilled my promise.

I was just trying to protect my rights

However, the infringing course was still available on moOCs on the 8th and 9th, and should still be available today. Look at this 6.18 festival breath, how thick ah!

I stopped Posting, and then I didn’t see moOCs taking them down, and I didn’t hear anything from MOOCs, nothing, nothing.

A lot of people ask me, do you send articles useful?

Look at that. If you don’t post an article, you don’t even have a basic apology. Instead of Posting an article to let everyone know about it, I went straight to the platform, which would absolutely tell me that I was “in verification”, and then “in verification” all the time. If I don’t write, I’m the ball that gets kicked around. If I don’t, I’ll be bullied to death.

Yesterday, I talked to some friends about this. These friends also asked some questions. Have the COURSES been removed from the MOOC? Did MOOCs apologize to you? Is the person who added you the lecturer himself? Did they tell you what’s going to happen next?

No, no, no, no, none of it.

It’s not a mistake. It’s a suspected offense

The lecturer apologized and I spoke to my lawyer.

My lawyer said I was a fool.

Here’s what the lawyer said to me:

“And you believe a few words?” “Can you identify him?” “And” You think you’re talking to a guy who’s probably sitting next to a bunch of legal people!” “, “Why didn’t you tell me earlier?” “, “Your replies were all good”, “If this kind of thing happens again, please come to me and let them talk to me.”

Everyone’s waiting for the follow up. I’m waiting for the follow up. However, there is no follow-up.

Oh, no, the next thing I know is that the class is still on sale, I received an apology from the lecturer, and my lawyer told me I was a bit stupid, lol.

I want to close this article with a quote from my lawyer, which reads:

He kept apologizing. He kept saying he did something wrong. Are they adults? Are they still kids? It wasn’t a mistake at all. It was a suspected offense.

conclusion

In fact, many people should also be like me, are waiting for an answer, such as a due respect, such as a result. The answer, however, is that the courses continue to be sold with no answers, no respect, and no results. Depending on this situation, there should be no results for the time being.

Moocs, as the leading IT education platform in China, should carry the banner of protecting intellectual property, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of originators, severely crack down on plagiarism, plagiarism and piracy, and set a good example for its peers. Never try to infringe on a developer’s legitimate intellectual property rights from above, and never encourage such abuses. Moocs, your sword should point to the dragon!

I’m programmer thirteen. As for the event that MOOCs modified my open source project Newbee-Mall and sold it online without notice or authorization, I didn’t just write this article, nor did I publish it on one platform. These articles have been published simultaneously on 13 platforms, including Jinri Toutiao, wechat official account, Weibo, Zhihu, Bilibili, Digg gold, Blog Park, CSDN, InfoQ writing platform, Si Fu, 51CTO, OSCHINA, Tencent Cloud + community, all under the name of “Programmer 13”.

I will continue to voice in my wechat public account, follow me to see the details of the event and the latest progress, after all, in other platforms may be inexplicable articles “no”. Also hope that you see the article friends can help forward, thank you again.

If there is a need to reprint friends, indicate the source can be reproduced, or you can contact me for article authorization.

June 6, 2021, was the first time I spoke out about this incident, and since then I have published five articles:

  • “Newbee-mall open source project was used as a course by MOOCs, but I had no knowledge of it. What kind of operation is this?”

  • “Newbee-mall open source project was used by MOOCs as a course, detailed comparison and record of the project, see here for more details”

  • An open source mall project used by MOOCs as the ultimate project of Java employment class. I recommend it to you.

  • “I spent 3680 yuan to buy a Java employment course on MOOCs, and there was an open source project written by myself!”

June 10, 2021, is the third time I have spoken out about this incident, which is why you are reading this article. I will continue to update this rights protection event.

Well, let’s hope for the best.

June 10, 2021 04:25Copy the code

In addition to indicate the reprint/source, all are the author’s original, welcome to reprint, but without the consent of the author must retain this paragraph of statement, and in the article page clearly given the original link, or reserve the right to seek legal responsibility.