Talk about React Fiber versus sharding

This article was originally published at github.com/bigo-fronte… Welcome attention, reprint.

Talk about React Fiber versus sharding

The React idea and the advent of Fiber

The idea behind React is:

React is, in our opinion, the premier way to build big, fast Web apps with JavaScript.

However, we sometimes have a very long and deep DOM list (without list optimization). After setState is created and updated, React will compare the nodes before and after creation (Reconcilation stage). The process of comparing is uninterruptable, because the main thread of the web page contains not only the JS execution, The style calculation also includes the rearrangement/redrawing required for rendering, which means that when the current Reconcilation(JS execution task) takes up too much time on the main thread, it can affect normal browser rearrangement/redrawing, and also normal user interaction (input, click, select, etc.).

To take an extreme example, we have a very deep list (1500 levels) that changes frequently:

function App() {
  const [randomArray, setRandomArray] = useState(
    Array.from({ length: 1500 }, () = > Math.random())
  );

  useEffect(() = > {
     changeRandom()
  }, []);

  const changeRandom = () = > {
    setRandomArray(randomSort(randomArray));
    cancelAnimationFrame(raf);
    raf = requestAnimationFrame(changeRandom);
  };

  const finalList = randomArray.reduce((acc, cur) = > {
    acc = (
      <div key={cur} style={{ color: randomColor() }}>
        {cur} {acc}
      </div>
    );
    return acc;
  }, <div></div>);

  return (
    <div>
      <section>{finalList}</section>
    </div>
  );
}
Copy the code

fromperformanceThe panel, toochangeRandomThe wholeJs to perform tasksTake up161ms

From the event loop,changeRandomFunction performssetStateEnter thereconcilationPhase, but because the list is so deep and the process is uninterruptible, it takes too long to include other tasksThe keyboard output.Style calculation.rearrangement.redrawSuch as:

From a browser frame, when the abovereconcilationThe task was blocked for too long, causing the view to not be updated at 16.6ms per frame at normal refresh rate, causing the frame drop problem

So based on React’s philosophy, in order to address the above issues and make the Reconcilation process interruptible, as well as other experimental features such as Concurrent Mode, and priority scheduling, React decided to rewrite the underlying implementation using Fiber

Fiber data structure and Fiber tree construction

Again, let’s take a random rendered DOM element

Health review | right right store in the corresponding DOM labelas globalVariable | switch to the consoleconsole| input temp1. __reactInternalInstance $mszvvg3x40p (behind there will be a smart tips)Copy the code

You can see the Fiber information corresponding to the current node

List the main Fiber data structures:

Tag: indicates the type of the Fiber node

export const FunctionComponent = 0; // Fiber node corresponding to FC
export const ClassComponent = 1;
export const IndeterminateComponent = 2; // Before we know whether it is function or class
export const HostRoot = 3; / / root Fiber
export const HostPortal = 4; // A subtree. Could be an entry point to a different renderer.
export const HostComponent = 5; // The node of the DOM document corresponds to Fiber, div,section...
export const HostText = 6; // Text node
export const Fragment = 7;
export const Mode = 8;
export const ContextConsumer = 9;
export const ContextProvider = 10;
export const ForwardRef = 11;
export const Profiler = 12;
export const SuspenseComponent = 13;
export const MemoComponent = 14;
export const SimpleMemoComponent = 15;
export const LazyComponent = 16;
export const IncompleteClassComponent = 17;
export const DehydratedSuspenseComponent = 18;
export const EventComponent = 19;
export const EventTarget = 20;
export const SuspenseListComponent = 21;
Copy the code

Type: HostComponent indicates the DOMElement type of the React element, or Fiber, or the component’s class or function
StateNode: Points to the real DOM object that was created
Return Child and Sibling: Corresponding to the parent Fiber, the first child Fiber and sibling Fiber nodes of the current Fiber respectively
Alternate: Dual cache use

current.alternate = workInProgress
workInProgress.alternate = current
Copy the code

The demo builds the Fiber tree like this:

React renders two processes

Render/Reconcilation (interruptibleinterruptible)
- beginWorkThe main function is to create initialized and updated subnodes of the current Fiber node, and return the first child of the current Fiber node to start the next performUnitOfWork
- completeWorkThe process of creating fiber. stateNode is based onbeginWorkGenerated new Fiber calldocument.createElementCreate a DOM node to store in fiber. stateNode, and then incommitProcess time to goappendInto the real DOM
Commit (do not interrupt, otherwise the DOM may change, UI DOM instability); The main task is to commit stateNode generated in the Render phase to the real DOM node

Scheduler: Scheduling module, scheduling tasks of render/ Reconcilation phase, and dividing tasks into 5ms each, which can be interrupted

Enable Concurrent Mode and fragmentation

Fiber time sharding requires Concurrent Mode to be enabled. This means that ReactDOM. Render, which we use by default, does not use time sharding even though Fiber is used.

Enabling Concurrent Mode requires only two steps:

Load up the experimental React and React-DOM packs

npm install react@experimental react-dom@experimental
Copy the code

useReactDOM.createRootTo create aFiberRootagainrenderalternativeReactDOM.render

ReactDOM.createRoot(rootNode).render(<App />)
Copy the code

The opening is complete.

Except for what we normally use, of courseReactDOM.rendertheLegacy ModeAs well asConcurrent ModeThere’s one on React Blocking ModeIn fact, it is to own the partConcurrent ModeAn intermediate version of the function, created as follows:ReactDOM.createBlockingRoot(rootNode).render(<App />)Comparison of the three modes:You can see that under ConcurrentMode, you have SuspenseList, which controls an order of Suspense components, supports priority rendering, interrupt pre-rendering, etc., and some new oneshook, such as usinguseTransitioncollocationSuspenseCan be used for load optimization,useDefferredValueTo do somestateValue cache, for some of the low priority but time-consuming updates, you can not update immediately, but getdefferDelayed state, etc., but these are still in the trial package and may change at any time, so I won’t go into details, if you are interested, check them out:Suspense for Data Fetching

Performance and User Experience comparison after Sharding Enabled (Concurrent mode vs Legacy Mode)

So let’s go back to the original demo, and let’s compare openingConcurrent ModeBefore and after sharding is enabledperformancePanel comparison: Before sharding:You can see that every update on the main thread is made bychangeRandomInitiate and then proceedreconcilationPhase andcommitPhase, the entire method is contained in oneTaskInside:

After the fragment is enabled: After the fragment is enabled, you can viewrender/reconcilationThe phases are divided into tasks, there are manyTaskAre all5msThe task of

At this point we add an input box to test whether the user experience has improved a lot and whether the reconcilation sharding is really that strong.

Add an input field, and don’t let the input field affect the random div deep List, so let’s pull the List out separately and wrap it in react. memo, so the setState of the input field doesn’t cause a rerendering of the List:

The outer layer:

function App() {
  const [filterText, setFilterText] = useState(' ');
  return (
    <div>
      <input
        value={filterText}
        onChange={(e)= > setFilterText(e.target.value)}
      />
      <button>button</button>
      <section>
        <List />
      </section>
    </div>
  );
}
Copy the code

A random List:

const List = React.memo(function List (props) {
  const [randomArray, setRandomArray] = useState(
    Array.from({ length: 1500 }, () = > Math.random())
  );

  useEffect(() = > {
    changeRandom()
 }, []);

 const changeRandom = () = > {
   setRandomArray(randomSort(randomArray));
   cancelAnimationFrame(raf);
   raf = requestAnimationFrame(changeRandom);
 };

 const finalList = randomArray.reduce((acc, cur) = > {
   acc = (
     <span key={Math.random()} style={{ color: randomColor() }}>
       {cur} {acc}
     </span>
   );
   return acc;
 }, <span></span>);
 return <div>{finalList}</div>
})
Copy the code

inLegacyMode, you can see that the input box has a little bit of a lag, mainly the wholerender/reconcilationTasks take up too much timeAnd then we turn onConcurrent ModeIt’s still blocked. It’s still a little bit stuck. LookperformanceThe discovery is mainly bycommitandlayout/paintTwo processes are stuck,

Of course when the input doesn’t just get stuck inrender/reconcilationIs not going to berender/reconcilationItself blocked, so it can be summed up:render/reconcilationShard and achieve the effect, at the interval of the shard can be inserted to perform other users of higher priority accordingly. However, to better demonstrate the effects of sharding, I decided to exclude itcommitThe process andLayout/PaintRearrange the impact of redrawing.

Look beyond the Layout/Paint process and the commit process to see the performance optimization that sharding brings

Put aside the rearrangement and redraw effects: cover the List component directlystyle={{ display: 'none' }}So that therender/reconcilationThere is no rearrangement or redrawing after the phase is completed, but it is generatedFiberIt will still be generated, but the final commit to the DOM will not render

<section style={{ display: 'none'}} ><List />
</section>
Copy the code

To make the effect more obvious, I directly copied two more lists and increased each List to 3000.

const List = React.memo(function List (props) {
  const [randomArray, setRandomArray] = useState(
    Array.from({ length: 3000 }, () = > Math.random())
  );

  useEffect(() = > {
    changeRandom()
 }, []);

 const changeRandom = () = > {
   setRandomArray(randomSort(randomArray));
   cancelAnimationFrame(raf);
   raf = requestAnimationFrame(changeRandom);
 };

 const finalList = randomArray.reduce((acc, cur) = > {
   acc = (
     <span key={Math.random()} style={{ color: randomColor() }}>
       {cur} {acc}
     </span>
   );
   return acc;
 }, <span></span>);

 return <div>{finalList}{finalList1}{finalList2}</div>

})
Copy the code

So, inLegacyIn the “performance” mode, we see that there is no performanceLayout/PaintTasks like this to block our input, leaving us withcommitNow, if I increase the number of lists,render/reconcilationIt is blocked for about 500 ms. It is very jammed.

Look at it nowConcurrent ModeCommitRoot (commitRoot) is no longer commitRoot (Concurrent Mode)display:noneA. commit B. commit C. commit D. commit

Summary and other Features of Concurrent Mode

Of course, we use exaggerated examples (deep nodes, removal, rearrangement and redrawing) to look at the optimization of render/ Reconcilation in Concurrent Mode alone. Of course, shilling is only a small part of the functionality of Fiber. The Fiber architecture unlocks a number of new features for Concurrent Mode:

, useTransition, useDeferredValue, etc. These are, of course, tentative. In our demo, we can use useDeferredValue to delay state. For example, if we get a long list in real time, but don’t want to block input boxes or other user operations, we can temporarily save the old state with useDeferredValue. Then we pass the old version of state to the component with memo. In this case, we reduce the timeliness of the list in exchange for improved user interaction, and our original state is always up to date, so it is not quite the same as increasing the polling time. Overall, Concurrent Mode unlocks a number of new features, some of which are trial, but you can expect improvements in performance and user experience when Concurrent Mode is in use.

Welcome to leave a message and discuss, I wish a smooth work, happy life!

I’m bigo front end, see you next time.

Talk about React Fiber versus sharding

Talk about React Fiber versus sharding

The React idea and the advent of Fiber

Fiber data structure and Fiber tree construction

React renders two processes

Enable Concurrent Mode and fragmentation

Performance and User Experience comparison after Sharding Enabled (Concurrent mode vs Legacy Mode)

Look beyond the Layout/Paint process and the commit process to see the performance optimization that sharding brings

Summary and other Features of Concurrent Mode

Related Posts

CodePush optimization to reduce update package size

Reduce repeated requests, and maybe this library will help you

JavaScript_ Stack of algorithms and data structures – > Stack – > Last In First Out