Wang Xin, Wu Ming, Zhang Kedong and Niu Wenju, defendants in the “Quick Broadcast” obscene material profit case, were heard in public by the Haidian Court of Beijing this morning. Court trial site, fast broadcast CEO Wang Xin believes that the prosecutor’s charges are not correct, fast broadcast company and individuals do not constitute a crime. There are also opinions on the allegations, Wang Xin said, fast broadcast is not dissemination of the property, also does not provide content to netizens.

In the trial process, qvoD CEO Wang Xin, Zhang Kedong and others with the court prosecutor’s dialogue is no lack of wonderful places, let’s feel (part of the dialogue excerpt) :

1. Prosecutor: According to the indictment, qvod software has been used by users to play obscene videos. Do you know this? Wang Xin: This can be clearly answered, no matter the good or bad video, the player needs to be turned on.

2. Prosecutor: Do you know that users use voD online obscene videos? Wang Xin: This is an individual user. Qvod cannot tell whether the user is playing online or local.

Prosecutor: You said that you have done a lot of measures to prevent users from clicking obscene videos. However, you found a large number of obscene videos in your cache server. How do you explain this? Wang Xin: I think it’s strange, too. Fast broadcast hundreds of millions of documents, obscene video is only a small part of them, there is a blind spot to report.

4, Counsel: since you can not effectively monitor bad information, why not watch one by one? Wang Xin: If so, the company won’t be able to continue…

Prosecutor: You know that your technology has been used by Internet users, you know that it is difficult to supervise, why don’t you transform? Ms. Wang: We are just a technology research and development company. Even if users don’t use our technology, they will use other companies’ technology. Technology companies are hard to come by these days.

6. Zhang Kedong: In the seized servers, the proportion of obscene videos is more than 70%, which is hard for me to understand. If this is true, it means that 70% of video sites are pornographic video sites, which is not in line with common sense. The evidence itself is questionable, first of all, whether the server is our hard drive, and second of all, whether obscene files may have been increased. So I think there’s something wrong with the evidence.

7. Zhang Kedong: If a certain bit rate is not reached, the fast broadcast software will start the cache server and accelerate. When the bit rate is reached, it will automatically disconnect. Judge: Why does the software know? Is it a robot?

Niu Wenju: We were rewarded by shenzhen Network monitor, but also won the “security award” during the 18th National Congress.

9. Presiding Judge: I think the functions of your qvod 110 system are not very complicated, and the technical difficulty is very simple. Blocked url is very easy to change? 100 a day? Wang Xin: After 100 million users, there is an efficiency problem, and the background may not be able to support it. Presiding Judge: No need to say more. I understand.

10, the presiding judge asked Zhang Kedong: are you engaged in technology? From what you know, is screen blocking achievable? Zhang Kedong: There is no such technical means.

What do you think of the qvod porn case?

Do you think Qvod CEO Wang Xin is guilty? Guilty or innocent