This problem is quite understandable if it is derived from some other Angle rather than from the absolute principle. Such as 10 DHS = 10 creates ˉ creates = 10 creates / 10 creates = 10/10 = 1. Seems to have solved it in a flash.
2. But then what is 0º? If we could write 0º=0¹ /0¹=0, we could get rid of the minus-¹ =0.
3. But a dividend of 0 does not make sense. In 10/0, for example, refers to the dividend of 0 no significance, no matter how many 0 together is likely to get a non-zero number (10) here, that is to say the expression should not have value, if there is a value, such as 2, said that in fact is equal to 2 0 add 10, but we said how many 0 together all can’t be equal to the number of a non-zero, So there’s something wrong with this expression, it doesn’t make sense to have a dividend of 0.
4. Notice how many zeros can add up to zero if the divisor is 0 instead of 10? The answer should be obvious, that if the divisor is 0, then it’s not meaningless to have a dividend of 0. So what is 0/0 here? You could say any number, which means you can pick any number. But if we don’t understand 0 as “empty” or “nothing”, but as a “sign”, how about adding up several “signs” to get a “sign”? The obvious answer is 1.
5. There is some debate about what 0º is, but most textbooks define it as 1. Notice, it’s a definition, an artificial definition, that defines the basis for doing some other complicated calculations. Perfect things may only exist in a defined world.
From reading “Programmer’s Mathematics” by Jie Chenghao
