A preface.
Now live SDK quite a lot, have a charge for a dragon, there are open source, for most non-professional do live, only a partial module projects have live requirement, of course, is that I wish to live fast development integration function, most of the live SDK can choose fees, development cycle is short, live fast, today will make a comparison between each live platform SDK charge, also can give you The developer provides a reference.
2. Live
I. Mainstream live STREAMING SDK
- 1. Qiniu live cloud http://www.qiniu.com
- 2. Interest on cloud live: https://www.qupaicloud.com/
- 3. Tencent live interactive: https://www.qcloud.com/product/ilvb.html
- 4. Netease video cloud: http://vcloud.163.com/live.html
- 5. Broadcast storm cloud: http://www.baofengcloud.com/
- Of course, there are other live SDKS, but I won’t list them all.
Ii. Cost Comparison:
1. Live
- The following platforms are based on the flow to charge, seven cattle in days as a unit, other has been the length of the unit charge.
- The following are for each platform:
100 people watching at the same time*Hd video (bit rate: 1M)*Cost per hourExpenses incurred: The number of,Bit rate,timeChange,cost*Corresponding multiples
| platform | Billing way | Cost of live | note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seven cattle live cloud | According to the day of the billing | Viewing costs 200 yuan per day | watch1-24 hoursbothPress 1 daycharge |
| Qupaiyun live streaming | Charges are based on time | An hour of viewing costs 15.82 yuan | Watching for hours,The fee is on this basis * A few |
| Tencent Interactive Live broadcast | Charges are based on time | It’s 40 yuan per hour | Watching for hours,The fee is on this basis * A few |
| Netease Video Cloud | Charges are based on time | It costs 44.38 yuan for one hour of viewing | Watching for hours,The fee is on this basis * A few |
| Storm cloud broadcast | Charges are based on time | It costs 39.55 yuan for one hour of viewing | Watching for hours,The fee is on this basis * A few |
2. Playback (on-demand)
| platform | Cloud Storage Fees | Download traffic charge | note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seven cattle live cloud | 0.165 yuan/G/month | 0.29 / G | Storage within 10GB free, download within 10GB free |
| Qupaiyun live streaming | 0.165 yuan/G/month | 0.36 Yuan /G(domestic),0.46 yuan /G(foreign) | Storage within 10GB free, download within 10GB free |
| Tencent Interactive Live broadcast | 0.03 yuan/G/day | 0.59 yuan/G | 20GB storage space, 60GB on-demand data,399/ year |
| Netease Video Cloud | 0.01 yuan/G/day | 0.56 yuan/G | There is no |
| Storm cloud broadcast | 0.01 yuan/G/day | 0.45 yuan/G | There is no |
Note: 3.
- 1. The above are the main charges. Some platforms charge low transcoding fees.
- 2. Some platforms offer packages that are 15% to 10% off.
Iii. Suggestions (for reference only):
- 1. The above live streaming SDKS can realize basic live streaming services with similar functions.
- 2. Qiniu live Streaming cloud and Qupai Live streaming cloud charge relatively low, can be given priority.
- 3. Qupai Live launched mobile live broadcasting solutions for Beijing Qupai and Aliyun.
- 4. Qiniu Live Cloud has cooperated with panda TV, Meizu new product release conference, Ping An and other big platforms.
Two: instant messaging
- 1. You can consider using: Huanxin INSTANT messaging cloud SDK, a service provider of instant messaging SDK early in China (official data: the common choice of 50,000 APP users,SDK covers 319 million mobile terminals).
- 2.http://www.easemob.com/
- 3. Fees for daily live users below 300,000, free forever, over 100,000 daily live users, 5,000 yuan/month
- Of course, even if the communication SDK has Rongyun, Alibaichuan and so on, each developer can choose according to their needs.
Remark:
The above data is for reference only, and the specific data on the official website of each platform shall prevail.