This year, I paid attention to a public account, the name is “code nong architecture”, see the content is very rich, I feel very good. Until I found out that one day he sent me a tweet that plagiarized my article. The original article of the official account has been deleted by him, but the penguin account has not been deleted (address: CommpetableFuture uses some optimization thinking in the process of anyOf). In addition, the title of my article is wrong, I analyzed allOf, actually wrote anyOf, I put here the screenshot released at that time:

Here is my link to the original article: CommpetableFuture using anyOf process some optimization thinking

This is what he wrote on his official account:

This is not the first time for me to be plagiarized. In accordance with international practice, I posted an official account, took screenshots, reported the report, and issued a status statement (Digjin, CSDN, Zhihu, etc.). Then, I received a reply from “Code Nong Framework” on Zhihu:

I thought he knew wrong, and we had a friendly exchange later:

One of my answers: What else does JVM runtime memory include besides heap memory and metadata area? What else does the JVM runtime memory include besides heap memory and metadata area? – Answer to the code farming framework – Zhihu

In this answer, he made some supplements on the basis of my answer, which was also posted in the later post, which referred to some of my answer. Although I can still see the shadow of some of his articles referring to my historical articles, I guess it may be because he saw my articles and was interested in this topic, so he also referred to my articles for research, and made some supplements and his own understanding on this basis. Some articles are more comprehensive, such as his research on CompletableFuture. I only initiate thinking on CompletetableFuture based on asynchronous response programming. Some articles are on different sides of the same issue, such as my JVM-related StackOverflowError and OutOfMemoryError, which tend to be more of a low-level principle, with 9 OOM common causes and solutions! It’s a practical analysis. Above, I think not too big problem. When I first started writing, also do not have too much attention to the problem of reference, began to pay attention to in the last two or three years, in the article with reference, if the article is based on some articles, my habit is marked (I feel not marked out possible was a blow to the enthusiasm of the original author), of course, this is different from person to person, not demanding. Technology, after all, is such a thing that it’s hard to define who to refer to, just have a clear conscience.

However, today, I was annoyed by this article from Code Farmer Architecture (how to add a column to MySQL’s big data table?). “, another complete copy of my article. MySQL > add a column to a large table

I mentioned in the article who raised this question:

Then, where is the source of the image in the article:

Then in the “code non architecture” article, not only copied my article, even my reference also to remove. This also washes…? MySQL > add a column to a big data table

To prevent deleting the article, I took a screenshot:

Which makes me wonder:

  • How much of what you post is original? How many of them are washes?
  • Last time you replied me that it was not thoroughly washed last time, should you pay attention to it in the future??

You deleted my reply under your plagiarized article. But here I am going to put it out and say to you:

Finally, attach the address of each platform of “code non architecture”, if you have been washed by him, you can leave a message:

  • CSDN
  • CNBlog
  • zhihu
  • Jane’s book
  • Oschina