– Add √ to React components

When writing the life cycle example, I found that it is not possible to demonstrate the life cycle effect with function components alone, so this section is dedicated to using class components as examples, as a complement to the knowledge of class components.

Upcoming demos are summarized below

Component communication mode (parent to child, child to parent)

Since the hook, we’ve almost always preferred to use function components (at least I do), but at some point function components don’t completely replace class components, which means that React developers still need to know about class components.

The father the son

In class components, note the reference to this in the method;

Although the setState method is also used to change the state, it is more complicated than hook.

Here’s the key code:

import React from "react";
import Child from "./Child";

class Parent extends React.Component {
    constructor(props) {
        super(props);
        this.state = {
            parentData: 1
         };
         
    // Bind this to changeParentData
    this.changeParentData = this.changeParentData.bind(this);
    }

    changeParentData() {
        this.setState({ parentData: this.state.parentData + 1 });
        this.forceUpdate();
    }

    render() {
        return (
        <div>
            <button onClick={this.changeParentData}>Controls the display value of child elements</button>
            <Child showData={this.state.parentData} />
        </div>); }}export default Parent;
Copy the code

See Demo for the complete code

Child the parent

Also note the problems with the this binding

If your method is written like this:

  sendChildData(data) {
        this.setState({
            childData: data
        });
  }
Copy the code

We didn’t add bind to this in the constructor

    this.sendChildData = this.sendChildData.bind(this);
Copy the code

Or not adding bind to this in the render pass function

<Child sendChildData={this.sendChildData.bind(this)} / >Copy the code

The following error is reported

You can also turn sendChildData into an arrow function instead of calling bind

    sendChildData = (data) = >{... }Copy the code

The key code is as follows

import React from 'react';
import ReactDom from 'react-dom';

class Parent extends React.Component {
    constructor(props) {
        super(props);
        this.state = {
            childData: null
        }
        this.sendChildData = this.sendChildData.bind(this);
    }
    
    sendChildData(data) {
        this.setState({
            childData: data
        });
    }
    
    render() {
        return <div>
            <Child sendChildData={this.sendChildData} />Display result:<span>{this.state.childData}</span>
        </div>}}class Child extends React.Component {
    constructor(props) {
        super(props);
        this.state = {
            newData: "aaa"
        }
        sendData = () = > {
            this.props.sendChildData(this.state.newData);
        }
        render() {
            return <div>
                <button onClick={this.sendData}>Modify parent component data</button>
            </div>}}}Copy the code

See Demo for the complete code

The life cycle

Before getting into the lifecycle, it is important to note that there are three lifecycle approaches:

• componentWillMount();Execute before the component renders
• componentWillUpdate();Execute before component update
• componentWillReceiveProps();The component executes before receiving the props data

When you use them, the compiler will tell you:

This method was deprecated in React 16.9.0, replacing it with UNSAFE_componentWillMount.

When you use the following three lifecycle methods:

• UNSAFE_componentWillMount();
• UNSAFE_componentWillUpdate();
• UNSAFE_componentWillReceiveProps();

To view the Demo

And it will tell you:

This method won’t be deprecated until React 17, and it also introduces two new lifecyclesto you: getDerivedStateFromProps and getSnapshotBeforeUpdate.

New life cycle:

• getDerivedStateFromProps;Completely replace obsolete methodscomponentWillReceiveProps
• getSnapshotBeforeUpdate;Completely replace obsolete methodscomponentWillUpdate

For the use of getDerivedStateFromProps and getSnapshotBeforeUpdate, you can check out the Demo.

In fact, when you use strict mode, the three life cycle methods of UNSAFE_xxxx will not execute and will report warnings.

More details can be found at reactjs.org/link/unsafe…

The following life cycle diagrams are commonly used

ComponentDidMount: Dom is loaded.

ComponentDidUpdate: The component is updated.

ComponentWillUnmount: The component will be unmounted.

You are advised to perform the following operations:

ComponentDidMount: Relies on DOM operations, web requests, and adding subscriptions

ComponentWillUnmount: Clear timer, unsubscribe

Here’s the full lifecycle map:

ShouldComponentUpdata: Returns a Boolean if the component is updated when it receives a new state or props.

ShouldComponentUpdata accepts two arguments, one is props and one is state.

ShouldComponentUpdata (); shouldComponentUpdata (); shouldComponentUpdata (); shouldComponentUpdata ();

Again, getDerivedStateFromProps and getSnapshotBeforeUpdate, which also receive two parameters, props and State, are significantly different from shouldComponentUpdata.

GetSnapshotBeforeUpdate is not needed very often but has a specific use case so should be presented separately. Its return value is passed as a third parameter to componentDidUpdata, which is useful when manually saving the scroll position during rerendering.

See Demo for the full life cycle sample code

Note: Since getSnapshotBeforeUpdate, componentDidMount, componentDidUpdate, and componentWillUnmount execute after Render, it is my custom to place them after Render.

Note that getSnapshotBeforeUpdate can also read the DOM after render, but the pre-commit phase of the graph is different from the commit phase where side effects can be run.

The above illustrations are from the life cycle atlas

Fragment <></>

Since a component can only return a root element, we would normally wrap a

in the outer layer, but sometimes if we write a component that doesn’t want to wrap an unwanted

in the outer layer, we can use react. Fragment in the outer layer. For example:

import React from 'react'

export default class Test extends React.Component {
    render() {
        return (
          <React.Fragment>
              <header>header</header>
              <main>main</main>
          </React.Fragment>); }}Copy the code

Render as follows

React.Fragment also supports phrasal <>, such as the following:

import React from 'react';

export default class Test extends React.Component {
    render() {
        return (
            <>
                <header>header</header>
                <main>main</main>
            </>)}}Copy the code

Render the same