A programmer ridicule: the interview is very advanced, what will be needed, only to find the project is garbage!
Programmers as a technical worker, is really should this sentence “technology is not pressure body”. I believe that many programmers have encountered such things in the interview, the interviewer will put forward all kinds of strange questions, regardless of the front end, background or framework and so on will involve, but often many of the interview content is completely useless in the work.
However, a programmer joked about this situation. Nowadays, when an ordinary programmer goes to an interview, the interviewer will ask about distributed, high concurrency, JVM, red black tree, etc. In fact, such deep and difficult content should be the standard of interviewing architects. What’s even more boring is asking a lot of questions in the interview, thinking the project is great, only to find out later that the project is a mess of mud and the interview questions are completely useless and irrelevant.
Want to do as a programmer, a lot of people have empathy, the interview is very advanced, according to the requirements of technical backbone to recruit, only to find that the company’s project is rubbish, he is just a after-sales technical support.
In fact, many companies are like this, endless demand pile, the amount of code like mountains, everyone only care about the completion of the character, but ignore the quality of the code, small companies, such as Ali did not avoid.
From the perspective of the interviewer, it is human nature to question the content of the interview, the so-called “in their position to do their job”, the interview content beyond the scope of responsibility, have the right to ridicule and doubt. But as an excellent programmer, I think it is very necessary to understand these technologies and knowledge. A person with knowledge reserve and ability, these are the foundation for them, because these contents will not only make the interview points, but also improve the competitiveness, only the ability is not enough to ridicule.
From the interviewer’s point of view, it is a responsibility to recruit a talented employee, front-end learning weixin: Tt-52057, but just did not choose the right interview method. A good interviewer is one who guides the interviewer to answer the questions. Step by step makes the interviewer perform better. Because some interview content looks very lofty, but because the general method everyone can understand, but in the actual business situation is not the same, from the general method to inspect the interviewer is not to see the strength of each other, so, questions also need skills.
So, what do you think about this.