This question does seem difficult to answer, as if you are digging a hole for yourself and saying nothing is good.
There are many answers online:
- My greatest weakness is that I have no weakness;
- I’m a workaholic;
- I pursue the ultimate, must do a good job.
The interviewer also came from the interviewee, and he had searched the Internet and knew the answers. Did he want to hear an answer from the Internet?
Presentation of amplification
If you were the interviewer, what would you want to ask? What do you see?
Take a step back. How do you know your weaknesses?
There is an ancient saying:
I examine myself three times a day: are you dishonest and scheming? Make friends and not believe? Is it not customary to pass?
Yes, is this sentence we from primary school Chinese in the recitation of Confucius yue, until 30 years old will be asked the interview.
And do we forget to “save ourselves” in the busy day?
This question examines whether a person can correctly “examine” himself, know his strengths and weaknesses, and correct and improve them.
It is not enough to only answer your shortcomings. The purpose of introspection is to overcome shortcomings and improve yourself, so a complete answer includes the above two aspects.
From the pit
But an interview is an interview, and some big truths are better left unsaid:
- I’m lazy, I procrastinate;
- I always miss DDL, and I fail to complete the tasks assigned by my leaders.
- I’m not a very skilled person…
Refer to the answer
In fact, at each person’s different stage, there should be different answers, and the answer must be you seriously reflect on yourself, so as to have grounds, first of all to convince yourself, to convince the interviewer.
For example, when I first graduated, I would say that I have little practical experience. Although I have learned a lot of theory in school, I may not have enough project experience. I have done some projects in school or after class to make up for it. However, I think it is far behind the projects in big companies in terms of scale and technology, so I want to learn more in big companies.
And this answer,
- One is to show his solid theoretical foundation.
How does the company measure a person’s growth potential?
Like the market, it predicts the future from the past.
Life is not a large random process, but a regression analysis.
A good history does not necessarily mean a good future. But chances are it can be done well.
If you do a bad job in history, how can you convince people you can do a good job in the future?
Even when I applied to Citadel after a year, the headhunter told me to expect a GPA or higher.
-
Lack of project experience is the truth, the project students do is not the same as the industry standards, so this shortcoming is objective existence, there is no fault.
-
But I also try to overcome this by showing projects THAT I’ve worked on, and then, if the interviewer is interested, giving details about projects that are relevant to the position.
-
Finally, ask questions and strike up a conversation with the interviewer. If he is willing to talk to you, then the problem is successful.
It is impossible to prepare all the interview questions and memorize the answers in advance. If you think and think about the interview, it is a microcosm of your daily work life, not a performance. You can do it for a while, but you can’t do it forever, and even if you make it through, there’s just endless pain afterwards.
For example, every time I post, I will reflect on the data and readers’ feedback and adjust the content. Have you noticed that?
What are common non-technical questions in an interview? Public number background reply “BQ” two words, send you often test question list ~
