preface
Recently put the left ear to listen to the wind column stressed again, notice that before did not notice the ARTS activities, for the first time to see this activity feel quite interesting, and it’s a good idea, but also in a hurry without deep thinking in the past, the discovery after re-reading this activity is not simple, but there are quite a few places need to pay attention to. Let’s talk about that.
What is the ARTS
Complete one ARTS every week: do at least one Leetcode algorithm problem, read and comment on at least one English technical article, learn at least one technical skill, share one technical article with ideas and thoughts every week. (Algorithm, Review, Tip, Share)
Why are ARTS events good
First of all, ARTS includes the training of an algorithm, which is much better than reading the algorithm. Besides, Leetcode is also done well. Although there is no APP, the Web version can be done well, and it is easy to get feedback and record the progress, which reduces the difficulty for the follow-up. This algorithm can tell you intuitively that the foundation of the piece is still relatively weak, it is easy to follow the path of targeted.
Secondly, ARTS includes reading and commenting on English technical articles, the core of which is English. English is a tool and a window to the whole world.
The third is technical skills, this is more broad, in the end what is technical skills, can only be regarded as a matter of opinion, the line of technical personnel in the usual work want to learn technical skills but is more difficult.
The fourth is to share a technical document with opinions and thoughts, which also depends on personal subjective judgment.
What is missing from ARTS
1. The characteristics of the ARTS activities are relatively easy to fall to the ground, but none of the components of the ARTS in a week is not what is the relationship between these four parts, it is likely to lead to everyone in the process of implementing caught something as material, easy to get lost (2) the requirements of the ARTS is not high, there is a broad decision basis, The difficulty of implementation is not very high, probably because Chen Hao did not have high requirements considering everyone’s actual situation. 3. Lack of review and review, humans are forgetful animals, and after two months of doing most things will have forgotten, it would be better if there were a proper review mechanism.
How to improve
1. Each cycle should be treated as an iterative cycle, and each cycle should have a Plan and Summary 2. 3. Choose the general goal for each cycle, and all the content should be carried out around this goal. For example, your goal this week is “skip table “, so the algorithm learning is also related to skip table. The technical points may be how to use the hops, on their own projects or open source, the last article will be about this part. 4. Change the mode to plan-study-practice-application-article -Summary, PSPAAS 5. This is much more difficult than ARTS, so maybe a two-week cycle is more appropriate.
conclusion
PSPAAS is currently a simple idea that may need to be revised before it can be implemented.