Today, a warm-hearted netizen reminded me that one of my articles was “reprinted” on Zhihu. When I clicked the link, I found that it was just a CV with a changed title and the content unchanged. Finally, I put my own course content at the bottom to promote it.
I was a little angry at the beginning, because for the original author, it is not easy to produce a high-quality content, and there is always a sense of humiliation when the results are intentionally appropriated by others.
In fact, he only needs to apply for reprint, basically I will allow, because whether the public or nuggets zhihu, looking for me to open white and reprint I have not refused, because I also like the content to be shared, and “ask a question” is a polite performance.
Honestly, if the articles you use to advertise your course are plagiarized, what do you need to prove the quality of your course?
But now think about the “pure” content creators do not much, of course, I also have no “cleanliness” of the creator, the last “move” in his article with the original address, and delete were @ my comments, although ultimately did not “ask me”, but “is set in place and set”, “handle” for some people, probably Nothing more than trivial and commonplace.
Because it’s not the first time I’ve been “carried,” and it won’t be the last time, there’s CV intact; There are modifications to the format and order “original”; There are also no source reproduced; Therefore, I used to publish the content of my articles synchronously on platforms such as Nuggets, public account, CSDN, Zhihu and Jianshu, which is convenient for protecting rights.
Of course, I will not take the initiative to search whether the article has been “CV”, which is usually a coincidence or a hint from netizens, because sometimes it is unnecessary to check this kind of problem, after all, the environment is so.
In fact this is why my project and articles are the cause of the open source and free, so many years I have written the original articles and maintain open source projects have received fee, in addition to in order to meet the achievement, have published a book may need to pay you, I have been advocating free content output, as I maintain the public, also almost no advertising, Because I know what I’m creating and typing for.
It’s not that I’m noble, it’s just that I feel free to write whatever I like and at my own pace, and that I’m not responsible for your liking and writing whenever I want.
So I can refuse white whoring with reason, also can follow one’s inclinedness output my point of view, the reader can not approbate, but I can be capricious.
Of course, I still hope that this circle can be more harmonious, less grumpy, after all, respect for others’ creation is also respect for their own, so if you need to “carry” my content in the future, in fact, you can “say” on the line.