Blockchain software company uses blockchain skills to reshape scientific publishing

Blockchain software company uses blockchain skills to reshape scientific publishing

The current nature of the industry raises several issues that affect the seminar community: the high cost of obtaining academic research, the copyright of publishers rather than authors, the lack of rewards and recognition for raters, and the large number of low-quality journals. Another major problem facing the industry is the long and sometimes biased book publishing and peer review process. In this process, academic journals often allow authors to introduce potential reviewers, which makes it extremely easy to use the system and get timely and lively discussion.

I believe that these problems can be solved with the full use of blockchain skills. I believe this so deeply that I co-founded Orvium, the first company to provide an open source and decentralized framework for handling academic publications.

Blockchain skills will make it possible to foster an open, trusted, decentralized, and collaborative environment that enables researchers to submit their work to the public record, where the broader scientific community can manipulate revisions and updates.

　　

For example, I just finished a paper on the untargeted effects of CRISPR on sickle cell disease. Publishing reports using blockchain works by using a browser to upload the report to a publishing platform based on blockchain. Using the open seminar and contributor ORCID, which provided a durable digital identifier, I was able to differentiate myself from other users on the platform. ORCID also provides a common login mechanism ideal for handling seminar ids.

Blockchain skills will enable my manuscript to be used from the moment it is submitted, creating a separate, decentralized, immutable timestamp proof of existence, authorship, and ownership.

For years, third-party companies have made huge profits from scientists’ work, selling journals and reprints to various organizations. In the blockchain-powered field of science publishing, researchers will control whether organizations need to pay to use their work, and together, if they wish, make it available to the public and researchers for free.

Use blockchain skills to continuously evaluate the revision history of manuscript and the quality of discussion. If the manuscript from the date of submission, even in the first draft stage, then from the beginning to submit the tedious process of research report will be eliminated, the transmission of the manuscript will be greatly accelerated.

　　

While information skills have made significant progress, it is a long and complex process from submission to the moment of announcement, from submission to announcement of uniform demand for 12 months. On average, the 17-week period is dominated entirely by the peer review process. Using the power of blockchain skills, through symbolic financial and reputational rewards, the invention of incentives, and the promotion of peer review, could dramatically speed up academic review and fundamentally change the landscape of scholarly publishing as we know it.

Blockchain skills have also opened the door to more discoveries, licensed by scientists. I believe that recognizing and rewarding the scientific community for their effectiveness in the peer review process will motivate more researchers to become active, involved and thoughtful. By fostering a decentralized and competitive marketplace, blockchain can help align policies and incentives for researchers, sponsors, academic organizations, booksellers, corporations, and governments.

　　

Publishing a book under the blockchain will allow the author to preserve ownership of his work through so-called non-substituting property. These are defined and stored in blockchain items (such as Copyrights, degrees, and certificates)

Mechanism in. A no-substitute token is a special type of cryptographic token that represents a unique property that is not interchangeable. Unlike cryptocurrencies or utility tokens that can be bought and sold between users, non-interchangeable property is used to indicate the copyright or license owned by the research author or the license buyer.

You can think of these tokens as digital versions of a checkroom ticket. Each employee is issued by the cloakroom clerk and can be cashed in with your coat only. The underlying item is an agreement, product, or service.

These changes will take time, but they are already under way. We all have a common goal, which is to combat the status quo of elite booksellers, to establish a transparent, comprehensive, competitive business model, to earn a modest income from supporting global research, and to keep power firmly in the hands of research staff from the beginning.

According to blockchain publishers cannot transform the system on their own. This will require a more concerted effort across the academic publishing sector. Researchers, sponsors, academics, publishers, businesses and governments are needed to work together to create a fairer, more transparent and more competitive marketplace run by society as a whole, free of the monopolies and hidden interests of biased oligarchs.

Blockchain publishing was once a lofty ambition to create a level playing field in scientific publishing, allowing researchers and research organisations to fully control the life cycle of academic publishing. I imagine a future in which researchers are free to set the terms and prices for the right to print, redistribute, download, translate and reuse their research. As blockchain makes scientific research more efficient and groundbreaking, we are at the top of a new, dynamic and transparent category of scholarly publications.

Exciting times are ahead!